Some Historic Trees — Themes and Context
Edition facts
Some Historic Trees — Themes and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 6,410 words, 28 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 22.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Trees -- United States -- History,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
t away and buried in the bottom of Lake Ontario. The trunk measured twenty-five feet, nine inches in circumference.
Probably next in age to the Big Tree was the famous Charter Oak in the city of Hartford, Connecticut. It was standing at the height of its glory and was estimated to be six hundred years old when the seeds of the commonwealth were planted there. Connected with it is a curious episode. When James II ascended the English throne, he took measures to suppress the growth of free government in America; he sent over Edmond Andros to take away the charters from the colonies and to rule over them as governor general. Connecticut refused to give up her charter. When Andros attempted to seize it during a night session of the Assembly, Captain Wadsworth bore the charter away and secreted it in a hollow of the old oak. After James II had been deposed and Andros had been banished from New England, the charter was taken from its hiding place and the government re-established. On a stormy night in August, 1854, the old oak was prostrated.
In the Kensington area of Philadelphia, an old elm stood until 1810, known as Penn’s Treaty Tree, because under it the renowned Quaker made his compact with the Indians. “I will not do as the Marylanders did, that is, call you children or brothers only,” said Penn, addressing the Indians, “for parents are apt to whip their children too severely, and brothers sometimes will differ; neither will I compare the friendship between us to a chain for the rain may rust it or a tree may fall and break it, but I will consider you as the same flesh and blood with the Christians, and the same as if one man’s body were to be divided into two parts.”
Until 1860 a venerable willow tree stood in New York City and it has an interesting history. When Alexander Pope, the English poet, built his villa at Twickenham, he planted a small twig that a friend had sent him from Smyrna. This little twig of the Salix babylonica, or weeping willow, became the parent of all its kind in England and in the United States. One of the British officers who came to Boston in 1775 to crush the American Revolution carried with him a twig from Pope’s willow to plant on American soil. The twig was presented to John Parke Custis, Washington’s stepson, and was planted at Abingdon, Virginia. In 1790 General Gates planted a shoot from it on his farm on Manhattan Island, where it became in time a beautiful willow, the grandchild of Pope’s willow at Twickenham.
Soon after the great conflict for American independence had begun, Washington was appointed Commander in Chief of the continental forces; on July 2, 1775, he took up his headquarters at Cambridge, Massachusetts. The following morning he proceeded to a great elm tree at the north end of Cambridge Common and drawing his sword, he formally took command of the army. The old elm tree was known afterward as Washington’s Elm.
Near the dividing line between North and South Carolina stood a famous tulip tree, marking the spot where the Americans defeated a part of Lord Cornwallis’ army in October, 1780. Because ten Tories were hanged from its branches after the battle, the tree was called afterward the Tory Tulip Tree.
Until about 1852, a majestic pine tree stood by the highway between the villages of Fort Edward and Sandy Hill (now Hudson Falls) on the Hudson in upstate New York. Upon its trunk was carved “Jane McCrea, 1777.” The inscription memorialized the tragic fate of Jane McCrea. The daughter of a New Jersey clergyman, she moved, after her father’s death, to her brother’s home near Fort Edward. Here she became engaged to a neighbor’s son. He was a loyalist who entered the army of Burgoyne. In 1777, Jane was captured by Indians and was killed instantly when a bullet intended for the savages pierced her heart. Her lover purchased the locks of his beloved, deserted the army, and retired to Canada, where he bewailed his betrothed’s fate until the end of his life.
In 1779 Washington sent Mad Anthony Wayne to storm the fort on Stony Point in the Hudson highlands. When asked by Washington whether he could carry the fort, Wayne replied: “I’ll storm hell if you will only plan it!” Under a black walnut tree, in the stillness of the night, Wayne gave orders to his men, and as stealthily as tigers they approached the fort and surprised it. In the early morning Wayne wrote to the Commander in Chief, “The fort and garrison and Colonel Johnston are ours.” The walnut tree has perished.
The pamphlet opens with a foreword that frames trees as 'the only living links between us and the remote past,' a phrase that sets a reverent, almost elegiac tone. The first part reprints an 1891 newspaper article from the Fort Wayne Sentinel, updated for modern spelling and punctuation. The second part, written by library staff, shifts focus to the Old Northwest. This dual origin means the reader encounters two distinct voices: the florid, 19th-century rhetoric of the original article and the more direct, factual style of the later additions.
A Two-Part Structure
The pamphlet is explicitly divided into two sections. The first, originally published in 1891, covers trees of the Colonial and Revolutionary periods. The second, written by the Library Staff, relates stories of notable trees in the Old Northwest. The foreword explains that grammar, spelling, and punctuation have been modernized, but the voice of the 1891 article remains ornate and moralizing. For instance, it describes trees as 'patriarchs of the vegetable kingdom, receiving the homage of myriads of children.' In contrast, the later section uses plainer language, as when it recounts the fate of the Harpe brothers: 'The incensed men decapitated Harpe, and impaled his head on a sharpened sapling.' Readers should note this shift in register between the two parts.
Trees as Witnesses to Violence
Several entries connect trees directly to acts of violence. The elm under which Logan delivered his famous speech is a site of mourning and vengeance. The tree known as Harpe's Head is even more macabre: after the outlaw Big Harpe was killed, his head was impaled on a sapling, which grew around it, and a face was later carved into the trunk. The pamphlet notes that the 'sculptured effigy remained clearly visible until the landmark was hewn down nearly a century later.' These stories treat trees not merely as backdrops but as active participants in—or markers of—bloody events. The reader should be prepared for a tone that can shift from reverent to grim without warning.
Logan's Speech and Its Setting
The pamphlet includes the full text of Logan's speech, delivered beneath an elm in Pickaway County, Ohio. The speech is a powerful appeal: 'I appeal to any white man to say if he ever entered Logan’s cabin hungry, and he gave him not meat.' The context provided explains that Logan had been a friend to whites until Colonel Cresap murdered his relatives. The tree thus becomes a symbol of broken trust and the cost of frontier conflict. The pamphlet does not analyze the speech but lets it stand, allowing readers to encounter it directly. This is one of the few moments where a historical figure's own words are quoted at length, giving the tree a specific human story.
The 1891 Article's Rhetorical Style
The reprinted 1891 article employs a grand, biblical rhetoric. It opens with a meditation on longevity: 'There has been no Methuselah since the flood. Man seldom lives longer than one hundred years.' Trees are described as 'living things that outlive them all' and as 'companions of the gray beards before the flood.' This style contrasts sharply with the later, more matter-of-fact accounts. Readers should be aware that the first part may feel dated or overwrought, but it reflects a particular late-19th-century sensibility that saw trees as moral and historical monuments. The pamphlet does not comment on this style, leaving the reader to navigate the shift.
Because the pamphlet draws from two distinct sources, readers may benefit from reading the second part first for a more straightforward narrative, then returning to the 1891 article to appreciate its period flavor. The stories are brief, so the entire work can be read in under half an hour. Pay attention to how each tree is tied to a specific event or person; the pamphlet treats trees as tangible links to history, not as botanical specimens.
Reading the old pamphlet, with its faded account of Logan’s elm, I felt the weight of time pressing gently on the leaves. That quiet sense of a tree’s long memory lingered with me, and I found myself reaching for Trees: A Woodland Notebook Containing Observations on Certain British and Exotic Trees — Story, Setting & Ideas, remembering how it, too, simply sits with these silent witnesses, asking nothing.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.