The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   221
In Category - Plants Flowers
Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882 Project Gutenberg 2001 Not confirmed
Climbing plants; Plants -- Irritability and movements; Geotropism; Plants Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 55,085
Reading time 240 min
Text sections 6

This digital edition of The Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants — Reading Notes is described by source-level measurements including 55,085 words, 4 hr estimated reading time, and 6 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Climbing plants,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Darwin's precise observations on twining plants, tendril sensitivity, and revolving movements, with corrections to earlier errors and a focus on gradual evolution.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

ductory remarks—Description of the twining of the Hop—Torsion of the stems—Nature of the revolving movement, and manner of ascent—Stems not irritable—Rate of revolution in various plants—Thickness of the support round which plants can twine—Species which revolve in an anomalous manner.

I WAS led to this subject by an interesting, but short paper by Professor Asa Gray on the movements of the tendrils of some Cucurbitaceous plants. {1a} My observations were more than half completed before I learnt that the surprising phenomenon of the spontaneous revolutions of the stems and tendrils of climbing plants had been long ago observed by Palm and by Hugo von Mohl, {1b} and had subsequently been the subject of two memoirs by Dutrochet. {1c} Nevertheless, I believe that my observations, founded on the examination of above a hundred widely distinct living species, contain sufficient novelty to justify me in publishing them.

Climbing plants may be divided into four classes. First, those which twine spirally round a support, and are not aided by any other movement. Secondly, those endowed with irritable organs, which when they touch any object clasp it; such organs consisting of modified leaves, branches, or flower-peduncles. But these two classes sometimes graduate to a certain extent into one another. Plants of the third class ascend merely by the aid of hooks; and those of the fourth by rootlets; but as in neither class do the plants exhibit any special movements, they present little interest, and generally when I speak of climbing plants I refer to the two first great classes.

This is the largest subdivision, and is apparently the primordial and simplest condition of the class. My observations will be best given by taking a few special cases. When the shoot of a Hop (_Humulus lupulus_) rises from the ground, the two or three first-formed joints or internodes are straight and remain stationary; but the next-formed, whilst very young, may be seen to bend to one side and to travel slowly round towards all points of the compass, moving, like the hands of a watch, with the sun. The movement very soon acquires its full ordinary velocity. From seven observations made during August on shoots proceeding from a plant which had been cut down, and on another plant during April, the average rate during hot weather and during the day is 2 hrs. 8 m. for each revolution; and none of the revolutions varied much from this rate. The revolving movement continues as long as the plant continues to grow; but each separate internode, as it becomes old, ceases to move.

To ascertain more precisely what amount of movement each internode underwent, I kept a potted plant, during the night and day, in a well-warmed room to which I was confined by illness. A long shoot projected beyond the upper end of the supporting stick, and was steadily revolving. I then took a longer stick and tied up the shoot, so that only a very young internode, 1¾ of an inch in length, was left free. This was so nearly upright that its revolution could not be easily observed; but it certainly moved, and the side of the internode which was at one time convex became concave, which, as we shall hereafter see, is a sure sign of the revolving movement. I will assume that it made at least one revolution during the first twenty-four hours. Early the next morning its position was marked, and it made a second revolution in 9 hrs.; during the latter part of this revolution it moved much quicker, and the third circle was performed in the evening in a little over 3 hrs. As on the succeeding morning I found that the shoot revolved in 2 hrs. 45 m., it must have made during the night four revolutions, each at the average rate of a little over 3 hrs. I should add that the temperature of the room varied only a little. The shoot had now grown 3½ inches in length, and carried at its extremity a young internode 1 inch in length, which showed slight changes in its curvature. The next or ninth revolution was effected in 2 hrs. 30 m. From this time forward, the revolutions were easily observed. The thirty-sixth revolution was performed at the usual rate; so was the last or thirty-seventh, but it was not completed; for the internode suddenly became upright, and after moving to the centre, remained motionless. I tied a weight to its upper end, so as to bow it slightly and thus detect any movement; but there was none. Some time before the last revolution was half performed, the lower part of the internode ceased to move.

Darwin opens this work by describing the twining of the hop, noting that the stem revolves in a regular manner, completing a full circle in about two hours. He emphasizes that this revolving movement is not a simple bending toward light but an inherent, spontaneous motion. Throughout the text, he meticulously records the direction and speed of these revolutions, often noting whether they follow or oppose the sun.

His method is observational and experimental: he ties internodes to isolate movements, uses light touches to test sensitivity, and even weighs threads to measure the force needed to trigger a response. The result is a detailed account of plant behavior that reads like a naturalist's field journal, with each species examined for its unique climbing strategy.

The Hop's Revolving Stem

Darwin begins with the common hop (Humulus lupulus), describing how its stem revolves in a regular, circular path. He notes that the movement is not a simple response to light but an inherent property: “the stem goes on revolving as long as it continues to grow.” The direction of revolution can be either with or against the sun, and the speed varies. He records that a young shoot completed a revolution in 1 hour 47 minutes, while an older one took 2 hours 30 minutes. This opening section establishes the core phenomenon—circumnutation—that he will explore across many species.

Sensitivity and the Grappling Tendril

In his study of tendril-bearing plants, Darwin pays close attention to the sensitivity of tendrils. For instance, in Lathyrus aphaca, he finds that the tendrils are highly sensitive only when young and about an inch long. A single light touch with a twig on the concave surface near the tip causes bending, while the upper surface is barely sensitive. He even tests with a loop of thread weighing one-seventh of a grain (9.25 mg) and observes a response. As tendrils age, they lose sensitivity, but their hooked tips can still grasp supports, utilizing “the last vestige of irritability.” This precise measurement of sensitivity reveals Darwin's experimental rigor.

Correcting Earlier Observations

Darwin frequently engages with the work of earlier botanists, such as Dutrochet, and does not hesitate to point out errors. For example, Dutrochet claimed that tendrils move away from light, but Darwin, after securing internodes to isolate the tendril's movement, found no such preference. He also corrects his own earlier statements: in the errata, he notes that conclusions about acceleration of revolving movement toward light were “drawn from insufficient observations, and are erroneous.” This self-correction underscores Darwin's commitment to empirical accuracy and the evolving nature of scientific knowledge.

Darwin's work is best approached as a series of careful experiments rather than a theoretical treatise. Readers will benefit from paying attention to the specific measurements—times, angles, weights—that he records, as these form the backbone of his arguments. The text also includes references to later studies by de Vries and Sachs, which Darwin engages with critically. For those interested in the development of Darwin's ideas, this essay, first published in 1865, shows his thinking on plant movement before his later book The Power of Movement in Plants.

Darwin’s patient notes on tendrils made me think of a quieter kind of attention, the slow trust in what a plant does without our asking. I found that same unhurried wonder in Botany: The Science of Plant Life — Text and Context, as if the pages themselves were breathing, reminding me how much can be learned by simply watching.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Before you leave, reflect on the book

Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks