A Preliminary Revision of the North American Species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora — Text and Context

(0 User reviews)   71
In Category - Plants Flowers
Coulter, John Merle, 1851-1928 Project Gutenberg 1998 Not confirmed
Cactus; Ariocarpus; Peyote; Plants -- North America Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 19,938
Reading time 87 min
Text sections 3

A Preliminary Revision of the North American Species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora — Text and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 19,938 words, 1 hr 27 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 13.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Cactus,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

John M. Coulter's 1894 botanical revision of North American Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora, based on field exploration and herbarium study, with precise morphological descriptions and taxonomic decisions.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

This etext was prepared by Dave Emme: demme@ix.netcom.com

A Preliminary Revision of the North American Species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora by John M. Coulter.

U. S. Department of Agriculture Division of Botany CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE U. S. NATIONAL HERBARIUM Vol. III--No. 2 Issued June 10, 1894 Preliminary Revision of the North American Species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora. by John M. Coulter. Published by Authority of the Secretary of Agriculture Washington Government Printing Office 1894 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL U. S. Department of Agriculture Division of Botany Washington, D. C., March 21, 1894 SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as Vol. III, No. 2, of Contributions from the U. S. National Herbarium, a Preliminary Revision of the North American species of Cactus, Anhalonium, and Lophophora, by President John M. Coulter. Respectfully, Frederick V. Coville, Chief of the Division of Botany. Hon. J. Sterling Morton, Secretary of Agriculture.

PRELIMINARY REVISION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF CACTUS, ANHALONIUM, AND LOPHOPHORA. Prefatory Note. In the fall of 1890 Dr. George Vasey, then Botanist of the Department of Agriculture, arranged with me to prepare a revision of North American Cactaceae. Owing to the peculiar difficulty of preserving material the family was poorly represented, even in our leading herbaria. To secure a large amount of additional material in the way of specimens and field notes the Department authorized me to visit the region of the Mexican boundary during the summer of 1891. Preliminary to this exploration it was necessary to examine the Engelmann collection of Cactaceae, in the possession of the Missouri Botanical Garden. This collection, supplemented by the continual additions made at the garden, is by far the largest collection of skeletons and living specimens in this country, and also contains the large majority of our types.

In March, 1891, I visited this collection and made such notes as seemed necessary for use in the field, and in June, accompanied by Mr. W. H. Evans and Mr. G. C. Nealley, I began field work in the neighborhood of El Paso, Tex. After ten days of exploration it was necessary for me to leave the field work in charge of Mr. Evans, who, with Mr. Nealley, continued work westward, during July and a part of August, to southern California, along the Southern Pacific Railway. As a result a large number of complete plant bodies was secured, but very few of them were in flower and the field notes indicated little besides collection stations. During the following fall and winter preliminary determinations of this material were made by Mr. Evans. In the fall of 1892 critical study of this and other collections was begun in connection with my assistants, Dr. Elmon M. Fisher and Mr. Edwin B. Uline, who have ever since rendered constant and most import assistance in the examination of material and bibliography, which alone has made the work possible in the midst of other pressing duties.

In the spring of 1893 these two gentlemen spent several weeks at the Missouri Botanical Garden in the critical study of its rich material, and during the latter part of their stay I assisted in the work. Dr. William Trelease, the director of the garden, had hastened the arrangement of the Engelmann material, and had mounted in convenient form the large mass of notes left by Dr. Engelmann. These notes contained not only critical remarks upon known species, but also the diagnoses of many unpublished species which had come into his hands, notably those collected by Mr. William Gabb in 1867 in Lower California. The collections that have thus far been studied are:

(1) Those of the Missouri Botanical Garden; and thanks are especially due to Dr. Trelease for his generous cooperation in the use of this material, without which the work would have been impossible.

(2) Those of the Department of Agriculture, including the results of several recent explorations, for the use of which I am indebted to Mr. Frederick V. Coville.

(3) Those of the Gray Herbarium at Harvard University, which Dr. B. L. Robinson kindly placed at my disposal.

(4) Those of the California Academy of Sciences, notably rich in forms from Lower California and the adjacent islands, kindly loaned by Mr. T. S. Brandegee.

(5) Those of Dr. Louis Eschanzier, of San Luis Potosi, Mexico, who send a large series of Mexican forms collected in 1891.

(6) Numerous small sets from different correspondents, who have given both time and material in aiding the work.

It is needless to say that Dr. George Engelmann, the great pioneer student of this difficult family, has opened the paths in which we must follow, and it was exceedingly unfortunate that he was not able to complete the final revision that he had in mind.

John M. Coulter's 1894 revision opens with a prefatory note detailing the logistical challenges of studying Cactaceae: preserved material was scarce, and the Engelmann collection at the Missouri Botanical Garden held most of the types. Coulter describes a field expedition along the Mexican boundary in 1891, where he and his assistants collected "a large number of complete plant bodies" but few flowers, leaving many determinations provisional. The work's voice is methodical and cautious, often qualifying observations with phrases like "it should be said" or "I have ventured to refer."

The text moves between broad taxonomic groupings and minute measurements—spine lengths in millimeters, tubercle shapes, flower diameters. Coulter frequently notes where specimens were cultivated ("growing in same garden in 1893") and cites earlier botanists like Engelmann and Salm-Dyck, revealing a collaborative, incremental process of classification.

Fieldwork and the Limits of Dried Specimens

Coulter's prefatory note reveals how fieldwork shaped the revision. He visited the Engelmann collection in March 1891, then spent ten days near El Paso before leaving the party under Mr. W. H. Evans. The expedition yielded many plant bodies but "very few of them were in flower," forcing Coulter to rely on vegetative characters and field notes that "indicated little besides collection stations." This scarcity of flowering material recurs in species descriptions: for Cactus corniferus, Coulter writes, "flower unknown," and for Cactus radians, he notes that fruit and seed characters came from a specimen whose spines matched a different variety. The revision thus openly acknowledges gaps in evidence, using phrases like "as yet we are ignorant of the flower" to mark incomplete knowledge.

Spine Counts and Taxonomic Boundaries

Coulter's descriptions hinge on precise measurements and counts. For Cactus radians, he records "radial spines 14 to 20, straight or often recurved, white or horny, 10 to 20 mm. long" and central spines "1 to 4, longer (18 to 32 mm.), more dusky." He frequently merges or splits species based on spine variation: Mamillaria impexicoma was originally separated by fewer radials and no central spine, but Coulter finds the central "occasionally wanting" even in forms with many radials, so he reduces it to synonymy. Similarly, he unites Mamillaria pectinata with Cactus radians because Engelmann had already doubted their distinction, and Mexican specimens "abundantly confirm this conclusion." These decisions show a taxonomist weighing continuity against variability.

Geographic Range and Cultivated Specimens

Each species entry lists collection stations and cultivated sources. Cactus radians extends "from the hills along the Lower Pecos to El Paso, southwestern Texas, southward through Coahuila and San Luis Potosi to southern Mexico." Coulter cites collectors (Wright, Palmer, Parry & Palmer, Eschanzier) and years (1849, 1852, 1880, 1891), creating a temporal map of botanical exploration. He also notes specimens "cultivated in St. Louis in 1853" or "growing in same garden in 1893," indicating that living plants supplemented herbarium sheets. For Cactus corniferus, he lists specimens from San Luis Potosi and cultivated material at the Missouri Botanical Garden, showing how garden observations filled gaps left by wild collections.

Coulter's revision is best read as a working document—provisional by design, with unresolved questions flagged rather than hidden. Readers interested in botanical methodology will find value in his candid remarks about missing flowers, ambiguous types, and reliance on cultivated plants. The text rewards attention to the small print: measurements, collector numbers, and parenthetical citations reveal the collaborative, iterative nature of 19th-century taxonomy.

That rainy afternoon, Coulter’s careful line drawings of Anhalonium made me linger over how slow plants move. Later, idly flipping pages, I found myself wondering about the invisible rhythms beneath those fixed spines. The same patience seemed to pulse somewhere else, quieter still, in Life Movements in Plants, Volume II — A Closer Reading, where motion hides in plain sight, unhurried and constant.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What was your reading experience?

Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Which reading stage best describes you?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

How easy was the book to follow?

Related eBooks